What Are The Better Sampling Swabs for COVID-19 Testing?
With the COVID-19 pandemic, accurate testing using respiratory samples has become critical. However, which sample type performs the best? Various studies have compared different respiratory specimens for detecting SARS-CoV-2. This article summarizes the key findings.
Multiple studies compared swabs like nylon, polyester, cotton, and dacron for collecting COVID-19 samples. A study testing 6 swab types found all gave similar SARS-CoV-2 RNA yields. However, virus recovery efficiency varied due to differences in absorbance and elution volumes. Overall, swab materials did not significantly impact detection when placed in a proper transport medium.
Several studies found nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs were more sensitive for COVID-19 detection than oropharyngeal (OP) swabs. However, NP swabs had higher collection risks, requiring close provider contact and causing discomfort. OP swabs may be easier to collect but have higher false negatives. For children, NP swabs may be more challenging.
Multiple studies assessed saliva, finding it was slightly less sensitive than NP swabs but with easier and safer collection. Self-collected saliva could be a feasible alternative, especially for population screening. However, optimal collection protocols and more data are needed to validate saliva as a standard.
Sputum samples had higher viral loads than upper respiratory samples in some studies. Sputum may be beneficial for symptomatic patients with productive coughs and initial negative NP swabs. However, sputum collection carries higher risk and is not possible for all patients.
Studies in adults found dacron swabs caused less discomfort than nylon during nasal sampling. But for children, nylon swabs had better performance and comfort. Despite differences in patient experience, swab materials gave comparable test results. Patient factors should determine appropriate swab selection.
Transport media like viral transport media (VTM), PBS, and ethanol could effectively maintain SARS-CoV-2 RNA integrity for molecular testing. However, normal saline was inadequate for viral preservation. Proper media can stabilize specimens until laboratory analysis.
Some methods successfully detected SARS-CoV-2 using direct RT-PCR on untreated samples, saving time and cost. However, optimal protocols, transport media, and PCR kits are needed to match standard extraction-based testing. Direct RT-PCR warrants further research for feasible implementation.
In summary, all sample types and test methods have trade-offs. Understanding performance comparisons can inform selective use of specimens and procedures to improve COVID-19 diagnosis. Ongoing studies are still needed to standardize and streamline testing workflows.
Click to View → Mantacc Sampling Swabs