Swabs with Transport Media: Essential for Accurate Testing During Flu Season 2024

A healthcare worker doing a swab test for a driver

I. Preparing for Flu Season 2024

As flu season 2024 approaches, health officials are urging preparedness as influenza activity typically rises in late fall, with peak incidence occurring between December and February. The flu season begins in October, with recommendations to get vaccinated by the end of the month for optimal protection. Despite low current activity, the CDC estimates at least 35 million flu illnesses, 400,000 hospitalizations, and 21,000 deaths in the ongoing season.
Staying informed and prepared is critical, especially for healthcare professionals, as they play a key role in early detection and management of the flu. Being aware of flu trends, vaccination guidelines, and treatment options ensures that both individuals and communities can minimize the impact of the virus.
A vital component of flu management is the use of diagnostic tools, such as swabs with transport media, to facilitate early detection. These tools help identify the virus quickly, allowing for prompt treatment and containment, which is crucial to reducing the severity of illness and preventing widespread outbreaks. Early diagnosis, particularly for vulnerable populations, can significantly improve patient outcomes and reduce the strain on healthcare systems. Weekly US Influenza Surveillance Report


II. What is Flu Season?

Flu season typically occurs during the colder months, from late fall to winter, peaking between December and February. The timeline varies slightly each year, with the season generally starting in October and lasting through May. During this period, the influenza virus circulates more widely, affecting millions of people annually, leading to significant public health concerns.
For flu season 2024, early trends indicate relatively low flu activity as of late September. However, the CDC's surveillance report for Week 38, ending September 21, 2024, highlights the co-circulation of multiple influenza strains, including Influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 and A(H3N2), as well as the potential for flu activity to rise in the coming months. Past seasons have seen fluctuations in severity, making it important to monitor trends closely. For example, the 2023-2024 flu season has already resulted in an estimated 35 million illnesses, underscoring the ongoing threat that the virus poses to public health.

The impact of the flu on public health is substantial. Beyond the immediate strain on healthcare systems, it can lead to complications, hospitalizations, and deaths, particularly among vulnerable populations such as the elderly, young children, and individuals with chronic health conditions. To mitigate this, proper testing, early diagnosis, and preventive measures like vaccination are essential. The CDC emphasizes the need for routine use of diagnostic tools, such as swabs with transport media, to detect the flu early and begin appropriate treatment, especially for high-risk groups. Vaccination, testing, and early intervention are the most effective strategies to reduce the spread and severity of flu during the 2024 season.


III. Flu Testing Methods

A variety of flu testing methods are available, each with different levels of accuracy, speed, and application. These methods can help detect the influenza virus in patients, providing valuable information for clinical decision-making and controlling outbreaks.

1. Rapid Molecular Assays

Rapid molecular assays are highly sensitive (90-95%) and specific tests that detect influenza virus nucleic acids in upper respiratory tract specimens. FDA-cleared rapid molecular assays can deliver results in approximately 15-30 minutes and are often CLIA-waived, meaning they can be used in point-of-care settings. Their speed and accuracy make them a popular choice, especially in outpatient settings.

2. RT-PCR and Other Molecular Assays

Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and other molecular assays are considered the gold standard for flu detection, offering very high sensitivity and specificity. These tests can differentiate between influenza A and B viruses and identify specific subtypes like A(H1N1)pdm09 or A(H3N2). Although highly accurate, results can take anywhere from 45 minutes to several hours, depending on the specific assay used.

3. Rapid Influenza Diagnostic Tests (RIDTs)

Rapid influenza diagnostic tests (RIDTs) are antigen detection assays that provide results within 10-15 minutes. While they are fast, they have moderate sensitivity (50-70%) but high specificity. Some of the newer tests have been FDA-mandated to achieve 80% sensitivity, making them more reliable than older versions. However, RIDTs are still more prone to false negatives, especially during peak flu season.

4. Immunofluorescence Assays

Immunofluorescence assays, which can detect influenza A and B viral antigens, take about 2-4 hours to produce results. These tests have moderate sensitivity and high specificity, and can provide more detailed information than RIDTs, but are generally more complex and require specialized equipment like a fluorescent microscope.

5. Viral Culture

Viral cultures, though not practical for immediate clinical management, are essential for public health surveillance. While traditional culture methods take several days (3-10 days), they allow for extensive genetic and antigenic characterization of influenza viruses, helping to monitor viral mutations and inform vaccine development.

6. Serologic Testing

Serological testing, which measures antibodies to influenza, is not commonly used in clinical settings because it requires paired samples collected weeks apart. It is primarily used for research and public health investigations rather than for diagnosing current flu infections.


IV. What Are Swabs with Transport Media?

Swabs with transport media are specialized tools used primarily in microbiology and clinical diagnostics for collecting and preserving samples, particularly in the context of viral testing, such as influenza. These swabs are designed to facilitate the collection of specimens from various sites, including the nasal passages and throat, and ensure their viability during transport to a laboratory for analysis.

Components of Swabs with Transport Media

  1. - Swabs:
    1. 1. Typically made from synthetic materials like nylon or Dacron, which do not inhibit the growth of microorganisms.
    2. 2. They are designed to efficiently collect and release specimens, ensuring that an adequate sample is available for testing.
  2. - Transport Media:
    1. 1. A liquid or gel medium that preserves the integrity of the collected sample during transportation. Common components of transport media may include salts, nutrients, and pH buffers.
    2. 2. These media prevent the degradation of the sample, inhibit the growth of contaminants, and maintain the viability of the target organisms for accurate testing.

Importance in Flu Testing

In the context of flu testing, the use of swabs with transport media is crucial for several reasons:
  • - Sample Integrity: The transport media helps to stabilize the viral particles, ensuring that the sample remains suitable for testing.
  • - Contamination Prevention: By inhibiting the growth of non-target microorganisms, the media enhances the specificity of the test results, reducing false positives.
  • - Ease of Handling: The swabs and media combination allows for easy collection, transport, and processing of samples, which is vital during flu outbreaks.


V. How Swabs with Transport Media Work in Flu Detection

Swabs are used to collect respiratory specimens from the nasopharynx or throat, where influenza viruses typically reside. Several types of swabs are commercially available, including plain (rayon-tipped), flocked nylon fiber swabs, and others with or without a transport medium. These swabs can either be dry or soaked in different viral transport media (VTM), universal transport medium (UTM), or saline.
For example, in the study cited, swabs used included plain rayon swabs without medium, swabs with virus transport medium (VTM), and flocked nylon swabs with liquid Amies medium or UTM. After collection, these swabs were stored under various conditions to evaluate the stability of viral nucleic acid(zjm1064).

Ensuring Sample Stability and Accuracy During Transport

The stability of viral nucleic acids during transport is critical for the successful detection of influenza using molecular techniques like PCR. The study evaluated the performance of different swab types and transport media at temperatures of 4°C, 22°C (ambient), and 37°C over seven days. It was found that samples collected using swabs with UTM, VTM, and E swabs (flocked nylon swabs with Amies medium) yielded consistently amplifiable products across the storage period. Plain dry swabs also allowed for the detection of influenza virus RNA when stored at ambient temperatures or lower, but at higher temperatures (37°C), the integrity of the viral nucleic acid deteriorated more rapidly.
For instance, when stored at 37°C, the CT (cycle threshold) values for dry swabs increased after three days, indicating a gradual loss of nucleic acid integrity. However, swabs stored at 4°C or ambient temperature maintained stable CT values over seven days, proving that lower temperatures are more conducive to preserving sample integrity during transport.

Additionally, the study found that swabs stored in Amies gel, which is designed for bacterial rather than viral transport, showed consistently higher CT values, meaning the viral RNA was harder to detect across all time points and temperatures. This highlights the importance of choosing the correct swab and transport medium combination for influenza detection.


VI. How to Get Reliable Swabs with Transport Media for Flu Season

During the COVID-19 storm, Mantacc received countless requests about the best tools for pre-testing sample collection. Here's a simple guide. Mantacc offers products that align with CDC and FDA standards, which we distribute globally. Consulting a healthcare provider remains crucial before any testing. Healthcare professionals should use synthetic fiber swabs with plastic shafts as CDC advises. FDA suggests that nasopharyngeal specimens are most reliable, especially collected with a flocked swab - a feature specific to Mantacc products.
Also, if nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs are taken, they must be fused into a single transport vial, as per CDC guidelines.
Note: Avoid calcium alginate swabs or those with wooden shafts, as they can render some viruses inactive and hinder PCR testing.

Customer Feedback

Mantacc's flocked nasopharyngeal swab has gained significant recognition from the Chiba government and local communities amidst their fight against COVID-19 and influenza. With their deployment in '自己検査キット' or self-testing kits, these swabs are highly valued for their superior sample collecting capabilities, user-friendly design, and smooth insertion attributes.

The Chiba government and local communities recognize the value of Mantacc's nasopharyngeal swab. Used in self-testing kits, its comfort and ease of use has improved the community's testing experience. Acknowledged by the government, it's a key component in their fight against COVID-19 and influenza. Mantacc is honored to contribute to Chiba's health initiatives with reliable diagnostic tools. Learn more about what Mantacc can do for Flu Season 2024

Mantacc sales banner


Related Posts

Avian Influenza Monitoring: Swab Pool Size and Viral Transport Media Matter